Author summary
93%2 analyzed articles/videos946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Free Beacon Editors results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 1,228 hits. Analysis detected 8,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (671 of 6,235 authors). This Washington Free Beacon Editors is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Washington Free Beacon Editors
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%Washington Free Beacon Editors (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.3% percentile
6.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 37.7%37.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 19.1%19.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 21.4%21.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 30.8%30.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 23.1%23.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 14.7%14.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 30.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 21.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos