Speaker summary
81%7 analyzed articles/videos200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These organization name drawn from the content results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Burden of Proof, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 200 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,603 of 28,364 speakers). This organization name drawn from the content is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
organization name drawn from the content

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
17.5% BS Score7 analyzed videos200 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate