Speaker summary
67%7 analyzed articles/videos147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oracle results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 499 faulty-reasoning hits from 147 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of 36% (18,284 of 28,364 speakers). This Oracle is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
22.0% BS Score7 analyzed videos147 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.4%13.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.7%13.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate