Author summary
97%2 analyzed articles/videos938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Mac Ghlionn results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 1,552 hits. Analysis detected 12,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,209 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,265 of 6,628 authors). This John Mac Ghlionn is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
John Mac Ghlionn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
81%John Mac Ghlionn (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,209
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.7%19.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.0%15.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 13.7%13.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.8%17.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 25.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos