Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janet M Harvey results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 386 hits . Analysis detected 3,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,009 of 6,628 authors). This Janet M Harvey is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Janet M Harvey
Author details
Total words: 4,060
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.2% 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst