Speaker summary
40% 11 analyzed articles/videos 643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ned Lamont results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 116.547 hits . Analysis detected 792.863 faulty-reasoning hits from 643 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,336 of 26,780 speakers). This Ned Lamont is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Ned Lamont
Speaker details
Total words: 643
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 4.2% BS Score11 analyzed videos643 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst