Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Laura Tillman results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 3,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,038 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Laura Tillman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Laura Tillman
Author details
Total words: 4,038
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst