Speaker summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos67.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Harp results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,176 of 28,364 speakers). This Natalie Harp is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Natalie Harp
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.6% percentile
43.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos67.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 70.5%70.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.5%36.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 70.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos