Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Boboltz results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 924 hits . Analysis detected 4,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,416 of 6,363 authors). This Sara Boboltz is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Sara Boboltz
Author details
Total words: 3,628
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.6% 22.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.5% 25.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst