Speaker summary
56% 9 analyzed articles/videos 457.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naim Qassem results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Slippery Slope , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.2% saturation with 455 hits . Analysis detected 1,426.616 faulty-reasoning hits from 457.333 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,503 of 28,364 speakers). This Naim Qassem is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Naim Qassem
Speaker details
Total words: 457.333
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.6% percentile 11.0% BS Score9 analyzed videos457.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 55.2% 55.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 28.8% 28.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst