Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Salhani results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 2,626 hits . Analysis detected 13,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,664 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,139 of 6,628 authors). This Justin Salhani is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Justin Salhani
Author details
Total words: 14,664
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst