Speaker summary
50%9 analyzed articles/videos299.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muriel Bowser results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 97.82 hits. Analysis detected 430.584 faulty-reasoning hits from 299.333 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,587 of 28,364 speakers). This Muriel Bowser is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
10.9% BS Score9 analyzed videos299.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate