Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farrah Tomazin results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 1,061 hits . Analysis detected 4,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,326 of 6,348 authors). This Farrah Tomazin is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Farrah Tomazin
Author details
Total words: 3,636
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.1% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 29.2% 29.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 29.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst