Speaker summary
54%35 analyzed articles/videos2,709.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Kehoe results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 428.256 hits. Analysis detected 3,439.084 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,709.667 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,112 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Kehoe is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score35 analyzed videos2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate