Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These and CNN's Kate S. Petersen results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 760 hits. Analysis detected 4,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,236 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,613 of 6,364 authors). This and CNN's Kate S. Petersen is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
and CNN's Kate S. Petersen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%and CNN's Kate S. Petersen (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,236
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos