Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WMTW results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 674 hits . Analysis detected 3,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 71% (122 of 410 publications). This WMTW is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 6,360
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst