Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meteorologist Mary Gilbert results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 760 hits. Analysis detected 4,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,236 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,806 of 6,628 authors). This Meteorologist Mary Gilbert is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Meteorologist Mary Gilbert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
28%Meteorologist Mary Gilbert (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,236
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos