Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KOAM News Now results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 1,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 36% (256 of 398 publications). This KOAM News Now is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
KOAM News Now
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%inlander.com1%
36%KOAM News Now (selected)2%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 2,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

36% percentile
025507510035.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Publication 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos