Speaker summary
56% 12 analyzed articles/videos 1,074.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Haberman results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 2,253.561 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,074.667 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,183 of 28,364 speakers). This Maggie Haberman is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Maggie Haberman
Speaker details
Total words: 1,074.667
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score12 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 19.6% 19.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst