Speaker summary
47% 8 analyzed articles/videos 488.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lin Jian results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Tu Quoque , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 175 hits . Analysis detected 1,459.839 faulty-reasoning hits from 488.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,892 of 28,364 speakers). This Lin Jian is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. Lin Jian
Speaker details
Total words: 488.333
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score8 analyzed videos488.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst