Speaker summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liam results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anchoring Bias, and False Dilemma, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 170.442 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,456 of 28,364 speakers). This Liam is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Liam
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.0% percentile
25.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 46.9%46.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos