Speaker summary
74%5 analyzed articles/videos165.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Aid Society results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.9% saturation with 102.321 hits. Analysis detected 481.853 faulty-reasoning hits from 165.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,243 of 28,364 speakers). This Legal Aid Society is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Legal Aid Society
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
20.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos165.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.0%22.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate