Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Spencer Norris results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 694 hits. Analysis detected 4,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Spencer Norris is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Spencer Norris
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Spencer Norris (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,708
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos