Speaker summary
80%4 analyzed articles/videos246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 304 faulty-reasoning hits from 246 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,957 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Laura
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 246
Content count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
10.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos246 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.2%12.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate