Fox News98%

BREAKING: GOP senator announces bill to end birthright citizenship after SCOTUS ruling 86%

6/30/2026, 4:45:33 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 1,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 645 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.4% and a BS Rank of 86% (3,092 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the video peer group.

Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno is on the Senate Homeland Security Committee and he has a plan to fix this problem once once 
and for all. 
Now, Senator, it's great to see you tonight. 
As I understand it, um you think you can solve this by this issue with birthright citizenship um by 
using inspiration from kind of an unlikely source, uh Senator Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. 
Explain that to us. 
>> Yes, so Laura, 1993, uh Harry Reid, a hardcore Democrat at the time, came up with a bill that had 10 points, one of which was clarifying that birthright citizenship does not apply to foreign-born parents. 
You have to be an American citizen on American soil for that to apply. 
Uh this bill also, by the way, cracked down on the numbers of asylum seekers. It cracked down on human smuggling. 
It massively tightened our borders and really hit employers hard who hired illegals. 
I'm going to introduce, when I get back from uh recess on July 13th, the identical bill. 
And Laura, what it's going to do is highlight two things. 
The Democrats of today are nothing like the Democrats of 1993. 
And if they choose to reject a bill sponsored by their majority leader that they named an airport in Las Vegas after, then I think to my Republican colleagues, we have no choice. 
We have to recognize that these Democrats want to systematically destroy this country. 
So, what does that mean? 
We have to eliminate the filibuster and get this thing done. 
>> No, I have to eliminate the filibuster, period. 
But, Senator Moreno, just back to the your your uh your solution you think to this, if this would pass, which uh it's not going to pass. 
But, if it did pass, 
the Supreme Court, five justices believe it is a constitutional imperative under the 14th Amendment. 
That that cannot be um changed by mere congressional action uh in terms of legislation. 
it would have to be, in other words, a constitutional amendment 
as Mike Johnson referenced. 
So, how how do you get over the fact that the court has spoken on this, at least for now? 
>> Well, if you look at that just in Justice Kavanaugh's dissent, he disagreed with that. 
He said that what we have to do is clarify what citizenship means. 
We can do that through an act of Congress. 
And if we pass that bill, and I don't say that we 
can't. 
I think we can. I think we can 
and should get 50 votes for that and 
prove that again the Democrats of today, 
Laura, are people that would have been considered far left extremists outside the political norm back even in the 1990s. 
And then if somebody wants to challenge that with the Supreme Court, I think we have an opportunity in Justice Thomas, which you mentioned, his 91-page is a must-read for every American. 
He lays out all the facts. 
Kavanaugh's on our side. 
I think we can flip Barrett and Thomas Barrett and 
and and Roberts if they actually see that Congress has taken action to address this issue. 
Look, Harry Reid thought there was a path forward to get this done. 
This is an imperative, Laura, because what the Democrats are doing is setting up our country for Democratic administration that will fundamentally destroy what this country is all about. 
>> Yeah, well, 
the Senate has got to get on board with actually representing the American people, the us, who we are. And that's not happening. 
Senator, we're going to be following this very closely. 
We appreciate it very much. 
Thank you. 
>> Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox 1. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.1%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias14.1%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 11.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic11.6%This article: 7.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias11.0%This article: 8.1%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect8.1%This article: 6.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion6.2%This article: 5.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias12.4%This article: 6.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 17.5%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias17.5%This article: 5.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias5.1%This article: 5.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias10.7%This article: 7.1%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias7.1%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.8%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority19.8%This article: 19.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma19.1%This article: 6.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope6.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.9%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization11.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.9%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question6.5%This article: 1.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal3.3%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.9%This article: 9.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground1.7%This article: 5.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity5.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.7%

645 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers23%attributed speech497writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Reid • 37 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Reid • 14 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Reid • 21 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Reid • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Kavanaugh • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Kavanaugh • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Reid • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Harry Reid

100%flagged-word coverage
98 attributed words66% of attributed speech93% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.