Speaker summary
68% 9 analyzed articles/videos 547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kush Desai results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,865.833 faulty-reasoning hits from 547 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (22,985 of 26,960 speakers). This Kush Desai is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Kush Desai
Speaker details
Total words: 547
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 11.6% BS Score9 analyzed videos547 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 22.9% 22.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 29.7% 29.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Tu Quoque: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst