Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arielle Hixson results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 934 hits . Analysis detected 5,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,746 of 6,628 authors). This Arielle Hixson is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Arielle Hixson
Author details
Total words: 4,848
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst