Speaker summary
41% 13 analyzed articles/videos 1,611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Wilson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Begging the Question , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 264 hits . Analysis detected 2,224.529 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,611 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,249 of 28,364 speakers). This Katie Wilson is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Katie Wilson
Speaker details
Total words: 1,611
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score13 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst