Author summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 6,887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Greenstone results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 4,611 hits . Analysis detected 27,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,664 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,658 of 6,372 authors). This Scott Greenstone is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Scott Greenstone
Author details
Total words: 22,664
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score13 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.4% 20.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst