Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Leibovitz results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 481 hits . Analysis detected 2,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,383 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (595 of 6,195 authors). This Sarah Leibovitz is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Sarah Leibovitz
Author details
Total words: 1,383
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.4% percentile 7.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 32.5% 32.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 27.6% 27.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 34.8% 34.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.0% 7.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 34.8%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 32.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 27.6%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst