Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 2,812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Libby Denkmann results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,948 hits . Analysis detected 16,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,830 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,573 of 6,629 authors). This Libby Denkmann is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Libby Denkmann
Author details
Total words: 14,830
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score12 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.1% 13.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst