Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maleeha Syed results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,571 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,194 of 6,361 authors). This Maleeha Syed is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Maleeha Syed
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%Maleeha Syed (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,571
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510065.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.5%13.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 5.3%5.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate