Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hans Anderson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 285 hits . Analysis detected 1,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,051 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (677 of 6,192 authors). This Hans Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. Hans Anderson
Author details
Total words: 1,051
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.1% percentile 6.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 27.1% 27.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.0% 12.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.8% 16.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.9% 16.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.5% 18.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 27.1%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Author 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst