Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hans Anderson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 1,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,051 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (677 of 6,192 authors). This Hans Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Hans Anderson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%Hans Anderson (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,051
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
6.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 27.1%27.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.0%12.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 16.8%16.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 16.9%16.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.5%18.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Author 27.1%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Author 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 13.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos