Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Burrows results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 378 hits . Analysis detected 2,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,366 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (823 of 6,189 authors). This Jason Burrows is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Jason Burrows
Author details
Total words: 1,366
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.7% percentile 5.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 27.7% 27.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.0% 16.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.6% 17.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 27.7%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst