Is Mayor Wilson turning off police cameras? Sort of 65%

By Scott Greenstone0%

3/20/2026, 4:15:03 PM

Topics: Politics
Keywords: Politics

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Red Herring, and Middle Ground, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 546 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.2% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,753 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the article peer group.

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson made a slightly confusing announcement on Thursday: She’s pausing the expansion of scores of police surveillance cameras around the city, except in the Stadium District, where 26 will go in ahead of the World Cup. 
Those new cameras won’t be turned on  except when there’s a “credible threat.” 
It’s Wilson’s effort to find a middle ground between businesses and community members who want the cameras to help catch criminals and some of her most active and dedicated supporters who are worried the federal government can access the cameras’ data. 
“Sometimes as the mayor you make decisions that no one's going to like. 
This might be one of those,” Wilson said. 
“Some people will be upset that I'm not turning off all the cameras immediately, and others will be upset that I'm not charging ahead with turning on more.” 
Wilson also ordered hundreds of license plate readers on Seattle cop cars be turned off. 
They'll remain off, just like the new surveillance cameras, until an audit can figure out how many eyes outside the local government can peek through all those lenses. 
Wilson isn't the only lawmaker in Washington trying to figure out how to respond to fears that Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies could peer through local police surveillance cameras. 
The City of Seattle and the state Legislature are trying to limit federal access to license plate readers and other surveillance technology, while cities like Everett or Redmond have turned them off after reports last year found federal agencies had accessed their data. 
Some of Wilson’s most dedicated supporters believe shutting the cameras off indefinitely is the only way to keep the federal government out. 
“The problem is that the records exist,” said Xochitl Maykovich, who was Wilson’s field director during her general election campaign last year. 
“The only way you can not get something is if it doesn't exist, which is why a lot of our government agencies do not collect immigration status." 
Maykovich and more than 1,200 other people who say they knocked doors for Wilson have signed a letter asking the new mayor to immediately halt the cameras’ expansion. 
Some activists are going further. 
A few hours before Wilson’s announcement, a handful interrupted Gov. 
Bob Ferguson as he signed a bill making it a gross misdemeanor to impersonate an ICE agent. 
“All cameras are hackable. 
All surveillance is subpoenable,” a protester holding a sign shouted, running in front of the governor’s podium. 
After the activists were forced out by police, they chanted outside, shouted into megaphones, and pounded on the windows. 
Ferguson told reporters later he understands the protesters’ frustrations, but it's not easy to figure out how to filter through the massive amounts of data the state shares with the federal government as part of investigations into crimes like human trafficking. 
“If we give information to a certain legitimate agency, even though they will sign documents saying, ‘We're not going to share with anybody else,’ they still do it anyway,” Ferguson said. 
“I've still got to be thoughtful about that information, and sometimes it's pretty clear we can cut this off and there's no harm in Washington state to it. 
Other times... it's more nuanced.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 4.0%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 3.2%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 4.7%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.6%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.5%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Scott Greenstone: 20.3%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.4%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.8%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.2%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Scott Greenstone: 2.5%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 9.4%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Scott Greenstone: 1.6%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.2%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 3.7%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.3%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 3.0%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.3%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.3%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.2%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 2.9%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.5%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 6.6%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 10.1%Scott Greenstone: 1.9%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma10.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.1%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Scott Greenstone: 6.5%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 7.5%Scott Greenstone: 1.0%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring7.5%This article: 5.1%Scott Greenstone: 2.8%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon5.1%This article: 5.9%Scott Greenstone: 9.6%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion5.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.7%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.9%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.5%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 2.4%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.6%Scott Greenstone: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.5%Scott Greenstone: 0.6%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground7.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.3%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.1%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.5%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.3%Scott Greenstone: 3.1%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice12.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 2.3%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 7.5%Scott Greenstone: 2.3%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 0.6%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Greenstone: 1.6%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

546 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.