Author summary
67%1 analyzed article/video1,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Klopotowski results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 793 hits. Analysis detected 4,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,442 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,835 of 6,365 authors). This John Klopotowski is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
John Klopotowski
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
56%John Klopotowski (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,442
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.6%14.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.9%8.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos