Speaker summary
⁠93%2 analyzed articles/videos112.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Hobbs results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 231.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 112.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 45.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,212 of 26,730 speakers). This Katie Hobbs is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
45.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos112.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos