Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos168.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Rouleau results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 58.2% saturation with 98.099 hits. Analysis detected 329.099 faulty-reasoning hits from 168.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,080 of 28,364 speakers). This Kate Rouleau is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Kate Rouleau
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 168.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
32.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos168.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 58.2%58.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 58.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos