Speaker summary
58% 7 analyzed articles/videos 520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karl-Anthony Towns results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , In-Group Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 222 hits . Analysis detected 1,038.184 faulty-reasoning hits from 520 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,476 of 28,364 speakers). This Karl-Anthony Towns is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Karl-Anthony Towns
Speaker details
Total words: 520
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 7.6% BS Score7 analyzed videos520 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 27.7% 27.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst