Speaker summary
⁠58%5 analyzed articles/videos7,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Haidt results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 2,448.362 hits. Analysis detected 12,940.205 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,901 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,263 of 28,364 speakers). This Jonathan Haidt is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Jonathan Haidt
Speaker details
Total words: 7,901
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.7%3.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos