Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 10,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Freddie Sayers results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 5,919 hits . Analysis detected 31,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,216 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,952 of 6,263 authors). This Freddie Sayers is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Freddie Sayers
Author details
Total words: 35,216
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst