Speaker summary
66%6 analyzed articles/videos400.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,315.023 faulty-reasoning hits from 400.333 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,641 of 28,364 speakers). This John is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
John
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.1% percentile
7.3% BS Score6 analyzed videos400.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate