Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Acton-Taylor results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 2,253 hits . Analysis detected 17,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,176 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,811 of 6,348 authors). This Lauren Acton-Taylor is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Lauren Acton-Taylor
Author details
Total words: 17,176
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst