Corrupt cop who SMIRKED after breaking handcuffed suspect's spine 19%

By Lauren Acton-Taylor0%

7/8/2026, 3:11:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 1,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 722 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,845 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the article peer group.

By LAUREN ACTON-TAYLOR, US NEWS REPORTER 
Published: 11:11 EDT, 8 July 2026 | Updated: 11:32 EDT, 8 July 2026 
A former San Diego cop who smirked after he fractured a suspect's spine before attempting a blatant cover-up has been handed a lengthy jail sentence. 
Jeremiah Manuyag Flores, 45, was captured on security footage grinning as he walked away from the suspect's jail cell moments after he battered him. 
The former San Diego Sheriff's Office deputy was accused of shoving the shackled 57-year-old pretrial suspect from behind in the San Diego Central Courthouse jail. 
The suspect flew 'across his holding cell' and slammed 'headfirst into the far wall' before collapsing on the ground, prosecutors said. 
'Flores did not provide JP with medical aid and failed to report his use of excessive force to a supervisor,' the Southern District of California US Attorney's Office said. 
The detainee was left lying in a pool of his own blood, suffering from a spinal column fracture, for over two hours before he was discovered by another deputy, according to the attorney's office. 
Yet, in a report concerning his interactions with the victim, identified as JP, Flores had made 'multiple false statements, including "no force used",' prosecutors said. 
On Tuesday, Flores was sentenced to four years and nine months behind bars for the August 2024 incident. 
Jeremiah Manuyag Flores, 45, was sentenced to over four years behind bars after video captured him smirking as he left the jail cell of a suspect he had shoved and left with a fractured spine 
The detainee was left lying in a pool of his own blood, suffering from a spinal column fracture, for over two hours before he was found by another deputy. 
Pictured: San Diego Central Jail 
Flores was charged in a federal investigation with deprivation of right under color of law and falsification of records and found guilty in December 2025 after a weeklong trial 
Assistant US Attorney Seth Askins said: 'The power disparity between the defendant who was in complete control and [JP], who couldn’t do anything to protect himself, was as wide as the ocean.' 
Askins said that Flores's 'only job was to walk with him,' and the victim made no action to escalate the situation, such as resistance. 
'The defendant didn’t have to use any force at all. 
All he had to do was to keep walking,' Askins said. 
According to court documents seen by the Daily Mail, the detainee also suffered a head wound in addition to the spinal fracture, which required surgery and months of hospitalization. 
US District Judge Linda Lopez condemned the deputy for his actions, stressing that law enforcement officers are relied on to 'do the right thing.' 
'What you do then matters,' Lopez said, before slamming the former-deputy for smirking after the incident. 
'I don't know how many years it's going to be before I get that photo out of my mind. 
Your conduct was egregious.' 
Flores was charged in a federal investigation with deprivation of right under color of law and falsification of records and found guilty in December 2025 after a weeklong trial. 
The detainee was left lying in a pool of his own blood, suffering from a spinal column fracture, for over two hours before he was discovered by another deputy 
'Upholding civil rights is fundamental to the mission of every law enforcement agency. 
When an officer violates that oath, equal accountability is essential to maintaining the public’s trust,' Special Agent in Charge Mark Remily of the FBI's San Diego Field Office said. 
'Today’s sentence reflects the commitment of the FBI and our law enforcement partners to thoroughly investigate such matters and ensure those who abuse their authority face appropriate consequences.' 
A spokesperson for the sheriff's office told the San Diego Union Tribune : 'Our agency does not tolerate the use of excessive force or lying by deputies. 
Any Sheriff’s employee who violates the law or policy will be held accountable.' 
His sentencing comes after he was freed on bond, and he is set to report to prison by August 18. 
Following his conviction, Flores was also fired from the sheriff's office and barred from serving as a law enforcement officer on any level of government. 
The Daily Mail reached out to the San Diego Sheriff's Office for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.8%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 4.2%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 5.0%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic12.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 4.7%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.9%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 48.1%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 13.1%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias48.1%This article: 5.5%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias5.5%This article: 3.3%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 2.0%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 2.8%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 4.9%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 1.6%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.6%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 6.0%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority26.6%This article: 4.8%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 5.3%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 24.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 10.3%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion24.0%This article: 4.8%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question4.8%This article: 2.8%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 4.9%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 4.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.2%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 1.7%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 22.9%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 3.3%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote22.9%This article: 6.8%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 19.9%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 9.2%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice19.9%This article: 16.3%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 2.8%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination16.3%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 2.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Acton-Taylor: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

722 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers39%attributed speech441writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageSouthern District of California US Attorney's Office • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSeth Askins • 32 words • 100.0% coverageSeth Askins • 24 words • 100.0% coverageSeth Askins • 10 words • 100.0% coverageSeth Askins • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDaily Mail • 29 words • 100.0% coverageLinda Lopez • 24 words • 100.0% coverageLinda Lopez • 16 words • 100.0% coverageLinda Lopez • 19 words • 100.0% coverageLinda Lopez • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMark Remily • 13 words • 100.0% coverageMark Remily • 29 words • 100.0% coverageMark Remily • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Mail • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Linda Lopez

100%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words22% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+10.9 ptsWriter: 27.2%Linda Lopez: 38.1%38.1%Unattributed Quote+19.7 ptsWriter: 10.4%Linda Lopez: 30.2%30.2%Quote-first Misdirection+17.9 ptsWriter: 7.5%Linda Lopez: 25.4%25.4%Indoctrination-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Linda Lopez: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.