Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linda Lopez results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,132 of 28,364 speakers). This Linda Lopez is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Linda Lopez
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
24.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos