Speaker summary
49% 6 analyzed articles/videos 412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Feder results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Slippery Slope , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 260 hits . Analysis detected 1,107.396 faulty-reasoning hits from 412 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,953 of 28,364 speakers). This Joel Feder is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Joel Feder
Speaker details
Total words: 412
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 8.6% BS Score6 analyzed videos412 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 34.4% 34.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst