Speaker summary
49%6 analyzed articles/videos412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Feder results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Slippery Slope, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,107.396 faulty-reasoning hits from 412 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,953 of 28,364 speakers). This Joel Feder is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Joel Feder
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.5% percentile
8.6% BS Score6 analyzed videos412 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.1%10.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.4%10.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate