Author summary
7% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elyse Betters Picaro results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,406 hits . Analysis detected 5,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,928 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,544 of 6,199 authors). This Elyse Betters Picaro is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Elyse Betters Picaro
Author details
Total words: 12,928
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst