Speaker summary
43%7 analyzed articles/videos134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Smith results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 276 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,499 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Smith is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Jack Smith
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
15.9% BS Score7 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate