Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Atkins results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 1,567 hits . Analysis detected 9,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (683 of 6,497 authors). This David Atkins is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. David Atkins
Author details
Total words: 4,080
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.5% percentile 6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 36.8% 36.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 38.4% 38.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.7% 34.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 21.0% 21.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 29.9% 29.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Author 38.4%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 36.8%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 29.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst