Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandi Buchman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 2,235 hits . Analysis detected 12,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,025 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,740 of 6,628 authors). This Brandi Buchman is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Brandi Buchman
Author details
Total words: 11,025
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst